4 Mistakes Almost Everyone Makes in EAM RFPs
We need to talk about total cost of ownership. Specifically, about total cost of ownership for enterprise asset maintenance and management (EAM) software.
Do any of these scenarios sound familiar to you?
If any of these tales of technology heartbreak hit close to home, don’t worry – you’re not alone.
When Your Software Hole-in-One Becomes a Hole
We all know legacy technology is bad for business. It results in some really serious problems for your organisation, namely: making maintenance activities more manual; crippling your ability to interface with the latest and greatest technological advances (or even just the latest version of your browser); and making your staff unhappy because it’s slow / user-unfriendly / medieval-looking.
Nobody goes out to procure stale technology, but you’ve taken your first step to legacy land if you choose a generic EAM software and do not account for the growth of that technology over time:
- Original installations will require extensive customisations because it is a generic, broad application that needs to be customised to reflect your industry or your business.
- Due to the large number of customisations required, it takes years to implement and deploy the software – so it’s already old by the time you start using it.
- At first, things seem great as the system is customised to your every need. However, as time goes by you enter a never-ending nightmare of trying to keep your system up to date: all customisations have to be developed, tested and potentially recreated to fit with the latest version.
- Because this process is lengthy, difficult and expensive, some organisations put off upgrades year after year until the system finally falls over – potentially with significant financial, operational or safety impacts.
Anyone familiar with Moore’s Law or Kurzweil’s work knows that technology is progressing at an exponential pace.
If your rail organisation wants to be its most profitable, efficient, reliable self, you need an EAM system that can keep up with technological advances and improvements. That means making the right choice when you go out to market.
4 Mistakes Almost Everyone Makes in EAM RFPs – and How to Avoid Them
An EAM system is a long-term investment and you want one that is as fit for purpose in 5, 10 or even 20 years as it is today.
Here’s how you can insure against obsolescence so your RFP stands for ‘Really Foolproof Purchasing’, not ‘Risky, Failure Probable’:
Mistake #1: Not clarifying the upgrade process.
AVOID by including a question about the cost of upgrades in your RFP. By this, I don’t mean just bug fixes that should be included in your maintenance agreement, but actual full version upgrades that include new features to keep your system rooted in the present.
Don’t forget about the implementation aspect either – will deploying those upgrades be an extra cost, or will it be included as part of your maintenance arrangement at no extra charge?
Mistake #2: Not finding out how the software evolves.
AVOID by asking about prospective vendors’ product development practices: do you have the opportunity to suggest enhancements or improvements that will be included as part of the core solution?
Or will you have to pay for customisations every time, because a public transport operator-specific feature is ‘too niche’ for their product roadmap?
Mistake #3: Going for ‘that well-known system everyone in every industry uses’.
AVOID by stating your preference for an industry-specific, commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) solution in your tender. A COTS solution that’s tailored for rail won’t need the extensive customisation that a generic, one-size-fits-none EAM system requires, which saves you money now and into the future.
Partner with someone that knows it’s in their best interests to keep up with industry trends and needs – so you don’t have to pay them to do it.
With a rail-specific COTS EAM, system upgrades can be performed more frequently so useability stays relatively stable
Mistake #4: Investigating the technology, but not the people behind it.
AVOID by getting a feel for their longevity. When you interview tender applicants, scope out whether they’re long-termers who will evolve with you and the rail industry or fair-weather friends to whom you will just be one of many, many, many clients. (Here’s some suggested questions.)
You want a vendor who is committed to growing with you and your industry, not constantly busy with bigger fish to fry elsewhere.
If you include all of the above as questions in your procurement process, you should be able to determine the EAM solution and vendor that will be the most suitable for your rail business today as well as tomorrow. Remember, it’s not just about what goes into the expense column of this financial year’s budget – it’s also about the costs (and opportunity costs) for many years to come.
At Trapeze Group, we have a ‘software for life’ philosophy. That means your Trapeze EAM system is kept up to date and up to industry standards for free for as long as you’re part of our maintenance and customer care agreement.
As people transport is all we do, we inform our EAM product development roadmap using the upgrade requests and feedback from our client base so we remain current with industry needs. Instead of doing one-off customisations, we build any new features for new clients back into the base product and release it to the rest of our clients in the next update so that everybody benefits.
Find out more by contacting your local Trapeze rail industry manager.